1066405 movies 572119 celebrities 80009 trailers 18947 reviews
Horns (2013)

Horns (2013)

R 120 minutes EN Drama , Fantasy , Thriller
He will bring out the Devil in you
In the aftermath of his girlfriend's mysterious death, a young man awakens to strange horns sprouting from his temples.
CinePops rating:
6.0 /10
6 votes
My rating:
Add to list

Top cast

Daniel Radcliffe
Ignatius Perrish
Juno Temple
Merrin Williams
Max Minghella
Lee Tourneau
Joe Anderson
Terry Parrish
Heather Graham
Veronica
David Morse
Dale Williams
James Remar
Derrick Perrish
Kathleen Quinlan
Lydia Perrish
Sabrina Carpenter
Young Merrin
Laine MacNeil
Young Glenna
Dylan Schmid
Lee at 13

Production crew

Editor
Makeup Effects
Special Effects Coordinator
Visual Effects Supervisor
Set Decoration
Visual Effects Supervisor
Producer

Horns (2013) - Official Trailer

Rate movie
4 reviews, comments and opinions
The most positive review

> Expected a very little, but delivered very hugely.
The first word I said after the watch was 'unbelievable'. That means the movie is not bad, but how come I missed it for this long. This is the best dark-fantasy movie I have seen recently. But earlier, I thought it would be like the movie 'Tusk' which made me a little uncomfortable to watch. So in the end, what's the difference between the tusk and/or the horn. Both come in a pair and animals have it to defend themselves from the threat. When I watched that movie, I lost interest in this. Yep, it is a silly reason and now I feel bad for that.
This movie dominated by the British cast, especially for having Daniel Radcliffe and Juno Temple I thought it was British film, actually it was not. It was a Canadian-US jointly produced, adapted from a book of the same name and directed by 'Mirror' director. The story was so good, not genuine, though explored the theme very well. For every few minutes later, the narration was taking a turn and that made the plot to get lot tighter before heading for the concluding part.
Maybe this the best movie of Radcliffe that I've seen after his goodbye to 'Harry Potter' movie series. I don't think he's a chocolate boy type, but this kind of movie suits him well. I think he should get muscles for more movie like this, but his height is another negative factor. The film was entirely shot in Canada, the photography was great, music as well as performances. Even those settings like woods, tree house feels kind of wet English and Scottish atmosphere that fits for a devilish mythical charactered movie like this. I regret for reviewing it so delayedly, but anyway I did it and over it, so I hope you watch it very soon as well if you haven't seen it yet.
7/10

Read all
The most negative review

I was looking forward to this film going into it, based on a highly entertaining book, but ultimately it was just okay.
Well shot and directed, Daniel Radcliffe is the best thing about it, but it lacked the punch and dark humour of the novel. Juno Temple's character feels painfully underwritten, as do most of the 2nd tier characters. The worst part is it takes itself way too seriously for such a silly premise. There is some destructive chaotic fun, but not enough of it. The creature design for the finale is very cool, then the film just sort of stops rather than giving a satisfying wrap up.
Could have, should have been much better, maybe that's my fault because I was expecting more. Still watchable, even if not memorable.

Read all
Production companies: Mandalay Pictures, Red Granite Pictures
Production countries: United States of America
Revenue: $3,900,000

Keywords

Click on a keyword to see related movies

Certificate:

R (Under 17 requires accompanying parent or adult guardian 21 or older. The parent/guardian is required to stay with the child under 17 through the entire movie, even if the parent gives the child/teenager permission to see the film alone. These films may contain strong profanity, graphic sexuality, nudity, strong violence, horror, gore, and strong drug use. A movie rated R for profanity often has more severe or frequent language than the PG-13 rating would permit. An R-rated movie may have more blood, gore, drug use, nudity, or graphic sexuality than a PG-13 movie would admit.)